|
BABERGH DISTRICT COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, COUNCIL OFFICES, CORKS LANE, HADLEIGH ON WEDNESDAY, 1 SEPTEMBER 2010
PRESENT: Mr R W Thake – Chairman
|
Mr C W Arthey Mr J C Brand Mr P G Gibson Mr P J Holbrook Mr L S Johnson Mr P Jones Mr B L Lazenby |
Mr N A Ridley Mr D C Rose Mr R C Smith Mr A J Ward Mr G S White Mr R Whiting |
Mr P K Beer, Mr D H Keane and Mr L H Young were unable to be present.
Mr M P Booth, Ward Member for Sudbury (South) was present at the meeting and spoke on Item Nos. 1 and 3 of Paper K84 with the consent of the Chairman.
34 - Substitutes 35 - Declaration of Interests 36 - Minutes 37 - Petitions 38 - Questions from Members 39 - Planning Application for Determination by the Committee
It was noted that, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule No 5, substitutes were in attendance as follows:-
Mr J C Brand (substituting for Mr L H Young)
Mr N A Ridley (substituting for Mr D H Keane)
None received.
RESOLVED
That the Minutes of the meeting held on 4 August 2010 be confirmed and signed as a correct record.
None received.
None received.
Members had before them an Addendum to Paper K84 (circulated to Members prior to the commencement of the meeting) summarising additional correspondence received since the publication of the Agenda, but before 12 noon on the working day before the meeting together with errata.
Details of further representations received in respect of Item Nos. 1 and 4 of Paper K84 were reported to the meeting and considered and taken into account before a decision was made in each case.
In accordance with the Council’s procedure for public speaking on planning applications, representations were made as detailed below:-
|
Planning Application No. |
Representations From |
|
|
|
|
B/08/00842 |
Mrs P Hunter (Objector) |
|
B/10/00740 |
Mr Waterson (Applicant) |
|
B/10/00606 |
Mrs M Simpson (Objector) |
|
|
Mrs G McLeish (Applicant) |
RESOLVED
That subject to the imposition of conditions or reasons for refusal (whether additional or otherwise), in accordance with delegated powers under Council Minute No. 48(a) dated 19 October 2004, decisions on the items referred to in Paper K84 be made as follows:-
|
(a) SUDBURY
Application No. B/08/00842 Paper K84 – Item 1
|
Full Application – erection of four two and a half storey dwellings (following demolition of existing dwelling), Rose Villa, Priory Walk. |
Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Chief Planning Control Officer to grant planning permission subject to a Planning Obligation under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 being completed a motion to defer consideration of this item for the receipt of an assessment from an independent Highways consultant was moved. Upon being put to the vote this proposal was lost.
RESOLVED
(1) That the Solicitor to the Council be authorised to secure a planning obligation under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990, to provide:
· A financial contribution towards public open space provision.
(2) That, subject to the resolution of ground contamination issues to the satisfaction of the Chief Planning Control Officer and the completion of the planning obligation in Resolution (1) above to the satisfaction of the Solicitor to the Council the Chief Planning Control Officer be authorised to grant planning permission subject to conditions, including:
· Samples of external materials.
· Landscaping and boundary treatments.
· Protection of the listed wall (protective fencing, no storage, ground levels, method of foundation provision).
· As recommended by LHA.
· Archaeology.
· Withdrawal of GPDO rights for alterations (which would include the insertion of new openings) extensions and outbuildings.
· Finished floor levels.
· Biodiversity.
· Any as advised by Environmental Health (contamination).
(3) That, in the event of the Planning Obligation referred to in Resolution (1) above not being secured, the Chief Planning Control Officer be authorised to refuse planning permission for the following reasons:
· Inadequate provision of public open space and play equipment contrary to Local Plan Policy HS32.
· Inadequate investigations for site contamination.
|
(b) SUDBURY
Application No. B/10/00740 Paper K84 – Item 3 |
Full Application – demolition of existing bungalow and garage and erection of 2 two-bedroom houses and 2 three-bedroom houses together with associated access and parking, Westway, Edgworth Road. |
RESOLVED
That planning permission be refused for the following reasons:-
· Adverse impact on neighbour amenity (HS28, HS02)
· Lack of a Flood Risk Assessment (PPS25)
· Unsuitable parking arrangements.
|
(c) GREAT CORNARD
Application No. B/10/00606 Paper K84 – Item 4 |
Full Application – erection of front porch; erection of pool shed (replacement of existing); partial replacement of shed complex (all retention of), 23 Canhams Road. |
RESOLVED
That planning permission be granted and that an informative note relating to noise and the provision of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 be provided.
|
(d) GREAT CORNARD
Application No. B/10/00781 Paper K84 – Item 2 |
Full Application – erection of 2 single storey dwellings with attached single garage. Construction of new vehicular access, land rear of 58 Broom Street. |
RESOLVED
(1) That the Solicitor to the Council be authorised to secure a planning obligation under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990, to provide:
· A financial contribution towards public open space provision.
(2) That, subject to the completion of the planning obligation in Resolution (1) above to the satisfaction of the Solicitor to the Council, the Chief Planning Control Officer be authorised to grant planning permission subject to the following conditions including:
· Standard time limit
· As recommend by the LHA
· No insertions or alterations to the roof (removal of PD rights)
· Boundary treatment to be submitted and agreed
· Materials to be agreed
· Details of tree protection fencing to be submitted and agreed.
(3) That, in the event of the Planning Obligation referred to in Resolution (1) above not being secured, the Chief Planning Control Officer be authorised to refuse planning permission for the following reason:
· Inadequate provision of public open space and play equipment contrary to Local Plan Policy HS32.
The business of the meeting was concluded at 11.10 a.m.
……………………………………….
Chairman
|